(Hat Tip ~ Selpaw)
AKA The Galled Bladder of Zion
(IsraelNN.com) Israeli officials are worried about a set of so-called “benchmarks” presented last week by U.S. diplomats that would be used as steps toward final status negotiations with the Palestinian Authority.
As before, U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice will fly to the region, this time on May 15th to drag the powerless PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas and unpopular Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert back to the bargaining table to enforce the implementation of those benchmarks.
The eight-month timeline calls for a series of steps that resemble the “confidence-building measures” laid out in the tattered Road Map plan, another U.S. initiative which Israel began to carry out and the PA basically ignored.
Prime Minister Ehud Olmert already tentatively agreed last week to comply with America’s latest laundry list, according to the Reuters news agency. U.S. officials said the PA had also agreed to carry out the plan, which is set to begin this month and carry on through December.
Neither Israel nor the PA, however, has officially responded to the document, which becomes a binding contract if both sides formally accept it.
Israeli officials are deeply concerned about the viability of the plan, authored by U.S. Security Coordinator Keith Dayton, U.S. Ambassador to Israel Richard Jones and U.S. Consul-General in Jerusalem, Jacob Walles.
The benchmarks include a deadline by which Israel will allow PA bus and truck convoys to shuttle between Gaza and PA-controlled areas of Judea and Samaria.
Israel is also expected to remove the security roadblocks in Judea and Samaria and extend operating hours at the major border crossings with Gaza.
More ominous, Israel will be forced to provide arms, ammunition and equipment to PA security forces in an “immediate and ongoing” manner, whenever U.S. Maj.-Gen. Dayton “requests” it.
[SNIP] READ IT ALL!
See Also:
Here
Here,
and Here
Rice Walks In, Iranian Envoy Slips Out
Update:
Reader Realwest's Letter to President Bush:
Dear President:I've been a fervent and faithful believer in you and in your attempts to do what's right for America, since the year 1999. In spite of some differences of opinion with you, on certain very specific issues such as immigration, I have always stood up for you and HONESTLY believed you have been trying to protect us all from the barbarians in the Middle East.When Speaker of The House Nancy Pelosi made her trip to Syria, I wrote all my friends and to every organization with which I have had any contact at all to protest this usurping of Presidential power. I even mentioned the Logan Act.I have of course realized how constrained you are, and perhaps justifiably so in the eyes of our Founding Fathers, by Public Opinion as to what may or may not be possible in foreign affairs.NOW I read where Secretary of State Rice may meet (obviously with your blessings) with Syria, since, apparently Syria is reducing it's assistance to the "foreign fighters" who are killing Americans in Iraq.I just HAD to tell you that you are both morally and politically wrong for allowing this meeting to even be discussed, much less occur.1. Syria - by our government's own statements has been and continues to be (perhaps more slowly than before, but still at it) enabling other people to kill Our Troops - Your troops as Commander in Chief. Sir, that is morally unconscionable.2. By allowing even the discussion of such a meeting, you - and I emphasize YOU -have made Nancy Pelosi the de facto President of the United States. She goes to Syria and many, many people complain about that - including your adiministration. The Syrians, of course, rejoice in the fact that they are no longer as isolated by the US, else why would Speaker Pelosi visit them? Then YOU turn around, FOLLOW Speaker Pelosi's ill conceived and morally wrong visit to Syria by authorizing your own Secretary of State to discuss having meetings with Syria. Politically you have just handed the Democratic Party a MAJOR victory domestically ("see, Pelosi LEADS, Bush follows") and may just in fact have turned over, at the least, our foreign policy leadership in the middle east to the Democrats for which they will have NO legal or political responsiblity over the outcome. IF it turns out badly YOU will be blamed; if Ms. Rice gets anything of aid to the United States out of her meeting with Syria, the Democrats will get the credit.I honestly don't know who is advising you on political matters but whoever it is is totally incompetent. On the Moral Issue of meeting with those who are actively engaged in enabling the murder of American troops, the good Lord knows who is your guide.
--->Wonder if on the ship titanic one would find a twin set of sheep's cloths??? (obviously no longer needed)
ReplyDeleteAll I can say is the picture which you posted says it all. You are a master at tying the written word to picture's video's and also music.
Thanks again for the hat tip BabbaZee!! I have to say I merely sent the url but it was you who put it into motion.
in closing...
Nothing disgusts me more then falling for what I thought to be a genuine president who truly cared; who was going to live up to his word. What a fool was I.
Yes, I have contempt for Condi Rice yet only those with heads in the sand would think she is her own boss. She is not her own boss!!
OH WHAT A FOOL I WAS!
ReplyDeleteI believed him too.
I made my friends and many many strangers who hold dual citizenship in Israel vote for him, I worked very hard at that.
He broke my heart 3 years ago.
And yes, CONDI WORKS FOR HIM.
Period.
realwest again! selpaw - if you're so inclined you might want to check
ReplyDeleteout the letter to Pres. Bush which I e-mailed and snail mailed to Bush on the Condi to Syria thread at LGF yesterday (IIRC, comment #87 or so).
But folks, both sides (actually all three - 2 for the Pali's) have to agree to this before it becomes any problem for Israel.
I love and will defend Israel forever, but DAMNIT Israel needs some leadership of it's own before anything really good could come out of any roadmap or other piece of paper.
I would like to add that I am still waiting for those who claim to be friends of Israel to take this subject into the light of day with complete honesty and candor... not dance around it nor fluff it up with sugar and half truths.
ReplyDeleteThis is why I am most thankful for your new blog and of course those true friends who do stand proud at all costs.
Thanks realwest.
ReplyDeleteYou are right on target.
I will go read your letter.
Thanks again.
Selpaw - thanks for the thanks!
ReplyDeleteLuz here. Bush is a mystery.
ReplyDeleteAfter the election remember he spoke about his political capital?
I think there is something to the theory that a person takes on the karma of the nations when he becomes a leader.
I think that there is more than one George Bush. There is the Bush that emerged after 9/11, there is the Bush that is insecure (remember he seemed insecure to many before 9/11 that only became impressed with him immediately after the tragedy?), and there is the Bush that is controlled by national history and other external forces.
The Bush that burned still exists but G-d forbid that we need a catastrophe to have that to re-emerge!
I know this is kind of mystical but there it is.
Luz ~ makes sense to me!
ReplyDeleteLuz again.
ReplyDeleteI also remember getting nervous when I came into contact with so many Jews who were thinking that Bush would be some kind of saviour.
Israel is too dependent on the permissions granted by the US.
Early on Bush made statements that set a double standard contrasting how Israel and the USA would respond to terrorists (AND THOSE WHO HARBOUR THEM!!!) He expected Israel to respond more gently to terror than the US was.
Sharon had the strength to not always listen to his request that Israel use restraint in certain situations.
I also want to defend Bush a little bit to with regard to Iraq. It was the Burning Bush that hit Iraq. It was bloody but it was idealistic. The first actual strike was hoping to get Saddam in the first shot where they thought that he was!
I remember Shai Ben-Tekoa (see deprogramprogram.com) saying at the time that America should topple Saddam and immediately get out. I didn't agree with him at the time.
But now I can see his point. What victory can Bush have in Iraq? The mission WAS accomplished when Saddam was toppled. That war was won. But now I think that the idealism of bringing democracy to Iraq has to be rethought. I think that the Burning Bush lost out to the insecure Bush that became confused. America is confused. Iraq could become even more of a nightmare.
These are just thoughts in progress.
Luz yes you are right
ReplyDeleteThe first big duplicity...
Not moving the embassy...after swearing to?
Bullshiticus maximus! Hypocrite!
Be back later
BabbaZee,
ReplyDeleteMore re: Bush approach to Arabs.
Get Saddam. Then Get Out.
By Sha’i ben-Tekoa
http://www.deprogramprogram.com/transcript/GetSaddam.pdf
Bear in mind when this was published: July 16, 2003! Almost four years ago…
Some history lessons here from a man who lives in Judea.
Luz
Realwest, RE: your letter,
ReplyDeleteWell said! I wish I was able to be as composed and articulate!
Bush II is so worried about being more successful than daddy-Bush I that he's now actively sabotaging his own administration. All he had to do was to "hang in there" and "stay the course," but instead he's looking for "a thousand points of darkness" to balance daddy's "thousand points of (ornamental and symbolic) light"... It's pathetic. Shakespeare could have had a field day with this. A psycological complex could even come out of it.
ReplyDeleteDubya has gone "nukular" on himself.