And that is all.

Click Me! Support The Keith Richards Home For Aging Sluts

Friday, July 18, 2008

Lucius: Liturgy for the Feral Nation


A Divine Liturgy written by St. James in the year 54 A.D.


A Feral Service

Like most of the Ferality, I am someone ambivalent about Churchianity. That is not to say I'm not a church-goer. I was for many years until circumstances arose that made that aspect of my life more complicated. In any event, for a long time I have been fascinated with the early Church and its relationship to later practices and the implications for believers today. My comments reflect my studies, my beliefs, and my experiences.

The earliest Church was Christ and the Apostles; from there it expanded out in the wider community. But what was the shape of that community? The initial recipients of the Gospel were Jews, and their religious life followed the patterns of Judaism. But, again, what was that? First, we have to be clear that Judaism in the first century AD was not Judaism as it exists today. The two are related, to be sure, but modern Judaism and Christianity are both outgrowths of currents in the Holy Land, and particularly in the region of Galilee.

The restoration of the Temple in Jerusalem marked the reesablishment of the Jews as a nation, but religious life had changed in the periods of exile and the diaspora. Only a minority of Jews lived in Judea, and only a minority of those were in a position to attend regularly to temple ceremonies. That latter, moveover, had a primarily political funciton. Ordinary religious life focussed around the synagogue. This was particularly true in the more distant areas, such as Galilee and the Hellenistic cities of Greece and the eastern Mediterranean.

We know relatively little of the early synagogue. It appeared to be fundamentally a room where men sat and discussed Torah. From the Jewish tradition the book of Acts and Pauls letters we can construct a little bit about the patterns. On Friday evening there would be a gathering at the synagogue where prayers would be offered. Upon returning, the Sabbath lights would be lit and the blessing said over the cup and the meal. At the conclusion of the Sabbath there would be a time for further contemplation or discussion of Torah -- the "upper room" of the Bible.

In the diaspora communities it would have been common for Jews and Gentiles to attend portions of the observances together -- the Gentiles being "God-fearers," those who accepted the God of Abraham but had not made the formal conversion to Judaism. And after the initial spread of the teachings of Jesus, members of the synagogue community would include Jews, Gentile God-fearers, and followers of Jesus.

The book of Acts and Pauls letters to the Corinthians tell us what ulimately happened -- the followers of Jesus were expelled from the Synagogues. This seems to have appeared more or less simultaneously throughout the diaspora world between 50 and 60 AD. Thereafter Christians had to gather in private homes. What occured was merger of the Sabbath synagogue service and the home observances.

We have two good pieces of historical evidence for the character of worship in the diaspora communities in the period after 60 AD. The first is the Epistle to the Ephesians. Scholars have long been troubled by this letter because it is not very "Pauline" in its language -- the vocabulary and syntax are very different from Paul's other letters. The late biblical scholar Markus Barth argued -- quite convincingly in my opinion -- that the reason for this is that the letter is largely knit together from hymns and liturgical texts in use in Ephesus. Much of the letter, when analysized closely, is actually writen in metrical verse. Barth showed that certain formulaic passages bear similarity to Greek religious texts from Ephesus. As an example, Ephesians 2:12-18 have obvious hymn-like characteristics.

That passage reveals much more, though. It shows how the early Christian community was made up of exiles -- Jews alienated from their community and Gentiles set apart from theirs. Keep in mind that the religious cults of the ancient world were essentially political -- to be a full citizen required participation in the pagan rites. A Christian could not do that, and would thus be alienated from his city. But through Jesus, the divisions between Jews and Gentiles had been erased.

The clearest sign of this would have been both -- Jew and Gentile -- together in the worship of the Lord.

What would that worship look like? Here our best source is a text known as the Didache. It is a very ancient text from Egypt, only discovered in the 1870s. There has been considerable argument over the date, but the best estimates suggest it had to have been written either shortly before or after AD 70. It contains the oldest formula for the celebration of the Lord's Supper.

On the Lord's own day gather together and break bread and give thanks (eucharistesate) having first confesed your sins so that your sacrifice may be pure. But let no one who has a quarrel with a companion join you until they have been reconciled, so that your sacrifice may not be defiled. [14:1-2]


The thanksgiving prescribed is markedly similar to the Kiddush:

First concerning the cup:

We give you thanks, our Father,
for the holy vine of David your servant,
which you have made known to us
through Jesus, your servant;
to you be the glory forever.



And concerning the broken bread:

We give you thanks, our Father, for the life and knowledge
which you have made known to us
through Jesus your servant;
to you be the glory forever.
Just as this broken bread was scattered
upon the mountains and then was
gathered together and become one,
so may your church be gathered together
from the ends of the earth into your kingdom
for yours in the glory and power
through Jesus Christ forever. [8:2-4]

The line "to you be the glory forever" seems to have been a response. As for the first part, it is highly likely to have been based on a local version of the standard Sabbath blessing. This blessing is for the beginning of the meal; afterwards there is a post-meal blessing:

We give you thanks, Holy Father
for your holy name which you
have caused to dwell in our hearts,
and for the knowledge and faith and immortality
which you have made known to us
through Jesus your servant;
to you be the glory forever.
You almighty Master, created all things for your name's sake
and gave food and drink to men to enjoy,
that they might give you thanks,
but to us you have graciously given
spiritual food and drink and eternal life through Jesus your servant. Above all we give thanks because you are mighty
to you be the glory forever.
Remember your church, Lord,
to deliver it from all evil
and make it perfect in your love,
and gather it, the one that has been sanctified,
from the four winds into your kingdom,
which you have prepared for it,
for yours is the power and the glory forever.
May grace come, and may this age [or "world"] pass away.
Hosanna to the God of David.
If anyone is holy, let him come;
If anyone is not, let him repent.
Maranatha!
Amen.

Simple, beautiful, and contains all that one needs.

For a decade now, this has been our Friday evening blessing, following the lighting of the lights. I usually add a psalm, and then during dinner we generally discuss some issue of scripture, generally following up on a question from one of the boys. My sense is that this is how the early community, barred from the synagogue, would have done things -- carry out the Sabbath eve requirments, say the appropriate blessings, and then enjoy an evening of food, friendship, and fellowship.

It is the practice for those who have been made strangers and sojourners in their own city as well as those divided by the lines of Jew and Gentile. It is intended to draw both together in fellowship and faith, to make them fellow citizens in the city of the faithful and thus to consecrate them to the work of building up Christ's body, as Ephesians says.

A Feral liturgy!

~ LUCIUS SEPTIMIUS

SOURCES:
FIRST

SECOND

THIRD


Ancient Byzantine Chants from The Divine Liturgy,
Holy Eastern Orthodox Church of Antioch
Sung in Arabic and Greek

You Down with OIC?


Naughty By Nature ~ You Down With OPP?



For background on the OIC see the following Spleen posts:

57 Ways to Weave Your Cover


WTF is the OIC & why should you care?


The Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) wants to criminalize Christianity at the U.N.




By Dr. Laurie Roth Wednesday, July 16, 2008



Since 1999, the OIC has been pushing with the U.N the ‘Defamation of Islam’ campaign. The OIC isn’t a small fry committee trying to be heard in the U.N., but is being pushed by the 57, Muslim nation members in it and reflects the Declaration of Human Rights in Islam which is only reflected by Sharia law. That is how they want human rights defined and filtered through, Sharia law.



What is it the OIC exactly wants and is pushing through the U.N.? Its actually quite clear when reading through even a little of this rubbish. On the surface they say they want to cover the defamation of all religions, but amazingly only one religion is mentioned by name as persecuted of sorts, Islam. According to Patrick Goodenough, International Editor, CNSNews.com, the text states they have “deep concern that Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism.”



They refer to that nasty mental illness that so many of us have, Islamaphobia, when we happen to in our hate and illness notice the forced sexual mutilations, beheadings, forced conversions, honor killings growing in America, buildings continuing to blow up, body parts continuing to fly past our windows and ongoing threats. Take more medication you mentally ill, hateful people. Don’t you know that real, international, religious freedom must submit to the wonder and edification of Shari Law?



The way this anti protection of religion and freedom piece of rot reads would only criminalize Christianity and push the execution of more Christians who are already being sentenced to prison and death for reading the wrong material, mentioning a verse to a Muslim or doing practically anything that might engage a real discussion in a Muslim country with a Muslim.



Patrick Goodenough, CNSNews.com, says it like it is in pointing out that this religious defamation idea is being used as a shield and a sword. “In Islamic countries, blasphemy laws are used as a shield to protect the dominant religion, but even more dangerously, they are used to silence minority religious believers and prevent Muslims from converting to other faiths, which is still a capital crime in many Islamic countries.”



Justice Scalia from our own Supreme Court recently reminded us of a few things of importance: “America is at war with radical Islamists. The enemy began by killing Americans and American allies abroad: 241 at the Marine barracks in Lebanon, 19 at the Khobar Towers in Dhahran, 224 at our embassies in Dar Es Salaam and Nairobi, and 17 on the USS Cole in Yemen. On Septemeber 11, 2001, the enemy brought the battle to American soil, killing, 2,749 at the Twin Towers, in New York City, 184 at the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., and 40 in Pennsylvania.”



Lets call this what it is. This aggressive effort of the OIC to slam this through the U.N and get the defamation piece approved by the U.N. itself is nothing but a declaration of War against freedom of speech internationally and Christianity. This is hidden in fancy, protective words, it would only protect MORE persecution, targeting and murder of more Christians and suck out even any soft ray of freedom a Muslim in a country might want to even discuss or compare their faith with any other. This will be brought up later this year at the U.N. again. Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon will give an expected report on the measure put together by the OIC in Pakistan last year and passed in a vote 108-51.
Lets talk more about the OIC’s special glasses of protection they want to cram down our mentally ill, freedom loving throats.


All freedom and religious protection must go through Sharia law. Lets see, beatings for wives and women, yes; Execution of gays, yes; crucifixion of robbers, yes; beheadings of Christians who preach the gospel, of course; execution for any convert from Islam to Christianity…..on and on it goes and reads. Gee, don’t you feel enlightened, inspired and eager to have the U.N. pass this Defamation of Islam Act? Have you figured it out yet that this is nothing but a bold maneuver of the Islamic countries to destroy Islam’s enemies and conquer the world, using violence, threats and killings as usual, but with an added flare, the most powerful International legal body officially behind them, the U.N.

If this passes with the money, power and push of the 57 members of the Islamic countries and friends, and the anti-semitic, anti-Christian and anti American U.N., get ready for an unprecedented blood bath world wide from the Religion of peace. Normal witnessing and sharing by a Christian pastor or missionary will be a crime, insulting and defaming Islam. That will mean a massive prison sentence or death sentence.




When are we all going to wake up and smell the sick tasting coffee? We are in a world war with Radical Islam. It isn’t Islamaphobia that we are struggling with! It isn’t hate for Muslims and their right to choose and express a different faith we are struggling with! It is that Sharia Law represents the complete opposite to our freedom of speech, constitution and the bill of rights! It is barbaric and condones beatings, torture and killings as a matter of course. OK, no more shy talk…..IT IS EVIL and the opposite of religious and personal freedom. It still blows my mind that Dr. Rowan Williams, the archbishop of Canterbury, has even suggested that Sharia Law should be implemented and allowed in Britain due to how many Islamics have immigrated and developed there. He also puts his other fat foot in his mouth when he criticizes Christianities’ history of violence and its harsh punishments….bla bla. After all, everything to make peace with the big dogs who control oil and want to kill you. Kiss up. Don’t tell the truth or defend the truth!



Read more about this nightmare push by the OIC at the U.N. and what you can do to sign a petition against this at www.aclj.org. Stand up for REAL freedom of speech worldwide. If someone of ANY faith believes in what they follow, they should be allowed to debate their theology, discuss it and share it. If it is so right on, attract people because they are drawn to its compelling love and truth, not forced to follow it, stay with it or die. I have taken insults, questions and attacks for decades against my Christian faith. That is fine. I don’t wish to kill people because they feel differently. Let me share why I believe and what my theology is based on in love, if we disagree, fine.



Radical Islam will not stop until it takes over our legal system, our cultures, our moral framework, the U.N., our school curriculums and our lives if necessary. I say a big fat NO to Radical Islam. Come and Kiss My Grits!




The official Palestinian news agency on the evening of 13 July carries several reports on meetings PNA President Mahmud Abbas held today with international leaders on the sidelines of the Union for the Mediterranean in Paris.


Abbas held meetings with British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, Cypriot President Dhimitrios Khristofias, and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Abbas discussed with them "issues pertaining to the Middle East area and briefed them on the efforts to advance the peace process and the situation in the Palestinian territories."

At 1309, the agency reports that Abbas also met with OIC Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu and briefed him on "the latest developments in the peace process and the obstacles it faces in light of the continuation of settlement activity in the Palestinian territories and the measures in occupied Jerusalem."

Originally published by Palestinian news agency Wafa website, Gaza, in Arabic 13 Jul 08.




THIN LIZZY ~ HOLY WAR ~ 1983

Missing Links in the Days of Dhimwits & Da'was


Dear World - Written by Rabbi Kahane 1988


Understand this, Feral Nation:


The thrust of the Baker Plan (ISG Report) was for the United States to CAPITULATE TO IRAN THROUGH SYRIA, FOR ISRAEL TO GIVE UP THE GOLAN HEIGHTS, AND FOR THE US TO SACRIFICE ISRAEL TO THE MUSLIM WORLD


It went into implementation immediately, despite what we were told at the time.



Spleen search: BAKER PLAN (scroll up from the bottom)




IRAN BRIEFS ALLY SYRIA ON STANDOFF WITH WEST



Spleen Search: Mottaki




Iran briefs ally Syria on international standoff over its nuclear program


Spleen Search: GOLAN HEIGHTS



Basher Al-Assad was treated to a red-carpet welcome in France.
The French have a long and dishonorable tradition of pimping and whoring!



Israel & Syria "talk" more peace bullshit, Turkey eyeballs hungrily




Self Loathing Israelis Volunteer to Jump in Oven





Sarko the Pimp has a Dream




Al Jazeera: SARKOZY REACHES FOR THE STARS





TURKEY AND SYRIA PLAN ON JOINT OIL COMPANY



BTW Turkey and Syria Comprise most of the land mass of Biblical "Assyria"






BIBLE SEARCH:
ASSYRIA and ASSYRIAN




Ephraim feedeth on wind, and followeth after the east wind: he daily increaseth lies and desolation; and they do make a covenant with the Assyrians, and oil is carried into Egypt.
~ Hosea 12:1




PETITION OPPOSING THE OIC - SIGN IT!



TURKEY: Flags, Veils & Sharia



Saving Iraq's Christians




More Capitalists Caliphellate Sharia





Terrorist sponsored Da'wa Bullshit in Al Andulus proposed as permanent UN body




"Interfaith Dialouge" website



The list of invited luminaries is only available as a PDF


It's a regular who's who of dhimmis, jihadists, pimps, whores, dirtbags and fools



Part one :
“Dialogue and Its Religious and Civilizational Foundations,” will be chaired by the secretary-general of the Millennium World Peace Summit. Topics include “Dialogue in Islam” and “Dialogue in Christianity.”




Part Two: “Dialogue and Its Importance in Society.”The World Conference of Religions for Peace will present a paper on “Dialogue and Interaction of Cultures and Civilizations,”



The president of the Foundation for a Culture of Peace , will deliver a “Dialogue and its Impact on Peaceful Coexistence.” Not to be missed: “Dialogue in the Face of Calls for the Clash of Civilizations and End of History.”



Part Three: “Common Human Values in Areas of Dialogue,” this chaired by the secretary-general of the World Conference of Religions for Peace. Guests include the director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR); the secretary-general of the World Forum for Proximity of Islamic Schools of Thought (Iran) and the rector of the Pontifical Council for Inter-Religious Dialogue at the Vatican.



Part Four: “Evaluation and Promotion of Dialogue” led by by the useful idiot secretary-general of the Jewish Congress in Latin America and the Caribbean.



Part Five: “Disseminating of Culture and Co-Existence of Dialogue.” Lectures include “Media and its Impact on Disseminating the Culture of Dialogue and Co-Existence.

The final communique will be an address given by the assistant secretary of the Muslim World League. I did not include a link to the MWL here, because every time I try to load it it crashes my browser.



Iranian News Agency Press TV Publishes Excerpts From Nasrallah's 7/16 Speech


"Welcome to the martyrs, the Lebanese, Palestinian, and Arab martyrs. They are the privilege of this Ummah. "



I got yer Ummah. Right here.



At Israel Matzav:



Here's a picture of Lebanese mass murderer Samir al-Kuntar at Wednesday's 'victory rally' in Beirut. AP sez he is "Gesturing Symbolically"



MANDRAKE! QUICK! COUNTER- GESTURE HYPNOTICALLY!





here's Al-AP's caption:


Samir Kuntar gestures as he symbolically breaks through makeshift prison bars during celebrations for his release in Beirut.


here's Al-AP's caption:


Released prisoner Samir Kantar salutes people as he arrives to pay his respects at the grave of slain top Hezbollah military commander Imad Mughniyeh, south of Beirut, Lebanon, Thursday, July 17, 2008. Five Lebanese prisoners who were set free as part of a prisoners swap between Lebanon and Israel prayed Thursday at the grave of Mughniyeh, pledging to follow his footsteps.(AP Photo/Darko Bandic)

Russian Oil Baron, Jailed in Siberia by Putin, Applies for Early Parole




Russia's $8 billion in arms sales for 2008




Very Rare Albino Eagle Appears in Colorado



Mosques of America Calendars - Now for Sale at the US State Department



Dig the LANGUAGE in this piece! It's the PROTOCOLS! THEY ARE TRUE!


A New York fundraiser and a Las Vegas gambling czar have become major headaches for Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, raising new questions about the relationship between Jewish Americans and the Jewish state.

THOSE ARE NEW QUESTIONS?


TONIGHT I'M GONNA PARTY LIKE IT'S 1939



THE PROTOCOLS ~ RAV SHMUEL

Thursday, July 17, 2008

Sherab Zangpo vs Uncle Chom


The THE: Angels of Deception 1986






The subversion of language is an exceedingly important element of the nihilist strategy: the preemptive brainwashing that can be produced by polluting the words - creating chaos in their meanings - is impossible to compare, in its depth and reach, to any other weapon used by the nihilists in their cultural war against Truth. Subversion by definition (Latin “subvertere” : to turn “vertere”, from beneath “sub ”, teaches us the Merriam-Webster ad vocem) , setting upside-down the meaning of the words is the main weapon of the cultists of the great “almighty” nothing.



The examples of the subversion of language are everywhere but we must turn to the great “masters” of the cult of the nothing to see some outstanding examples of language driven crazy.

We find an extreme example of subversion of a word in a column published on the Net by one of the great “masters” of the far left, supposed to be (if we want to listen to the leftist propaganda) a lucid intellectual. This column by Noam Chomsky can be found HERE


In it he happily carries on all the usual far-left blathering about the “fact” that “the political class in Washington and London” represents only itself and that the claims of the Free World to be fighting for Freedom are just lies, while the TRUE “world” is instead well represented by the polls conducted all over the four continents that would show a deep, diffused hate for America.

(Any idea of how these polls are organized in Countries where there is not the faintest trace of free speech is not discussed by the author, who anyway seems to have been voting with his feet since many decades ago and has never decided to move out and away from the dictatorial cage of “Washington and London”. He never moved to live in those “four continents” where the right to hate America is the only “civil right”…but this is not a point worth discussing of course, because we all know how childish the leftists are in their hypocritical whining…)


The important point is instead that all the leftist generic blathering in this column mutates into specific chaos-work when Chomsky interestingly states (evidently to present an enlightening example of how we should think and read the TRUE reality of the world) that the hijacking of the ship Achille Lauro by palestinian terrorists, had been a “retaliation” for the bombing (by the Israeli Air Force) of the HQ of the palestinian terrorists…


In the published column’s text: “The Achille Lauro hijacking was a retaliation for the bombing of Tunis ordered a week earlier by Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres.” [Editor’s note: of course no bombing of the city of Tunis had been “ordered”, what had been ordered was the bombing of the HQs of a terrorist organization in Tunis, and for everything we know, Tunis is still there and has not faced any “Hiroshima” destiny…but you never know, maybe “Washington and London” have rebuilt a plastic Tunis and are telling us another lie… ]

As the reader certainly remembers, and Chomsky mentions, during the hijacking of the Achille Lauro Leon Klinghoffer, the handicapped Jewish-American civilian confined to a wheel-chair (“crippled American” in the language of Chomsky, suddenly oblivious of political correctness but still able of acknowledging that this had been a brutal murder), had been murdered and thrown into the Mediterranean Sea by the terrorists.

Chomsky is clever enough to use the word “retaliation” for the hijacking and not directly for the murder, but his court of law tactics evidently cannot hide the fact that the murder of Klinghoffer falls inevitably under the large shadow of the word “retaliation” that he uses for the hijacking.

Now, we have to look at this word, “retaliation”.
It’s of common usage on newspapers and on TV news, isn’t it ?
Yes, in fact this is how they brainwash us.

Let’s see.The Israeli Air Force attacks the HQs of terrorists in Tunis (by the way, funny how the bosses of international terrorism tend to settle down FAR from where the action of their pawns and puppets is).

It can be certainly said that the IAF attacks were “in retaliation” of the terrorists’ attacks in Israel, isn’t it ?

Strangely enough, Chomsky says instead the “retaliation” was the further act of terrorism, by the same organization whose HQs had been bombed in Tunis.
Let’s see: someone knocks down the door of your home and attacks you. You answer and punch him.


Do you think that - if at this point the crook punches you again - any judge would find his behavior rational, let’s say…a “retaliation” caused by your defending yourself and your home ?
Of course not.


But here the case is slightly darker. Here the crook, that you have sent running away from your home, goes to someone else’s home. Maybe someone who has your same last name. Let’s say someone confined to a wheel chair. In the course of this attack, the crook kills this person and throws him into the sea.
And that, in Chomsky’s words, is a retaliation for you defending your home.


Funny way to use words, isn’t it ?
And don’t forget, this guy is a great intellectual, who has been teaching in a great university. This is even funnier, isn’t it ?


Evidently there is a rat here, somewhere.
We all know which rat. The crooks, oops, the “intellectuals” like Chomsky think that Israel has no right to defend herself, HENCE the terrorists have any right to “retaliate” against Israel... defending herself.


For the chomskys of this world it doesn’t matter that the formation of the State of Israel had been ratified by the United Nations, it doesn’t matter that, in spite of international law, all the Arab neighbors of Israel have attacked Israel in 1948, in 1956, in 1967 and in 1973 with the DECLARED goal of destroying Israel and throwing all the Jews of Israel into the sea and that they have been defeated by Israel four times but never punished by the international community for committing the crime of an illegal war. (Evidently, this is the behavior of that “international community” that Chomsky praises at the beginning of the column.) It doesn’t matter even that, after FOUR genocidal wars have failed, the Arab neighbors of Israel have supported, financed and organized powerful terroristic organizations to carry on THOUSANDS of bloody attacks inside Israel, killing thousands of Israeli civilians in the last four decades.
All this doesn’t matter for the chomskys of this world.
For him, a terrorist attack is a “retaliation”.

You know, he wants to put in your mind that, in the best case, the whole problem is the famous “cycle of violence”. You know, the old “cycle of violence”: a gang of crooks attacks your home, you defend yourself, they burn down the house of your relatives.
A cycle of violence.


Just that. Not a crime. Not a repeated crime, no, no. Just a “cycle of violence”.
And the crooks have the right of “retaliating”.


If you had not defended your home, if you had done the crooks the favor of letting them kill you, rape your Wife and children and throw them into the sea, everything would have been OK.


If Israel had not committed the "crime" of resisting FOUR genocidal wars and THOUSANDS upon THOUSANDS of acts of terrorism, everything would be peace and happiness in the Middle East.

Eternal peace.

The same peace and happiness of the killing fields of Cambodia.


[SNIP]



READ IT ALL AT "TRUTH - FREEDOM - TRADITION"

Sherab Zangpo's new blog (which is Feral as a MFer)


CLICK ME, I AM AMONG YOUR WEAPONS OF WAR

Lucius Gives Good Thread


THE RED ELVISES: LOVE PIPE



Birth pangs of the Messiah.

In his commentary on the mysticism of Abraham Abulafia, Gershom Scholem notes that, taken to it's logical extreme, mysticism can lead to the conclusion that one can be, or is, one's own messiah. If Messiah is the bridge between man and God, the one who eliminates the abyss that, since the breaking of the vessels, has stood between us, then the mystic who in his own person can experience the unmediated presence of the One outside of the boundedness of History is, for that moment of the presence, "messiah" albeit in a deeply personal sense.

The idea that each of us can become our own messiah, however, denies to God His role, and also denies the role of History in the plan of salvation. We ourselves become the agents of our own salvation and therefore do not need God.

It is this hubris, the belief that ourselves, without need for the Divine, can accomplish that perfection, that drives impatience with the imperfections of the World, of Creation, and, thence, of the Creator Himself. And as impatience grows, so does anger, resentment, and a sense of enmity with God. Why does He hide his face? Why does he withhold His ultimate gifts? Why must we wait?

These questions were asked a long time ago, time before time. They led to the war in heaven, which has since become the war on earth.

Islamism, Communism, Fascism, Scientism -- all of these are the modern manifestations of the old mysticism.

~ lucius septimius



One aspect of eugenics, the ape-man hybrid, and myriad other forms of social and biological engineer intended to produce a perfect class of "drudge workers" is that they are founded upon an ancient and deeply ingrained misreading of Aristotle.

In the Politics, Aristotle discusses the notion of "natural slavery." He suggests that there might be people who, because of various mental infirmities, be naturally best suited to serve as slaves since they were incapable of taking care of themselves on their own. A careful reading of his discussion, however, reveals that here, as in many places, Aristotle is being deliberately deceptive.

If "natural slavery" were to be morally acceptable, than it would have to be the case that the slave would be unable to function without the direction of the master. And one could argue that, yes, there are people like that. But not many. And, frankly, those who fit his description wouldn't make very good slaves because they wouldn't have enough intelligence to make choices or carry out their duties without constant supervision. In other words, there might well be natural slaves, but they wouldn't be worth it because they would lack the comprehension and mental capacity to be effective workers.

This leads back to one of Aristotle's central principals -- nearly all political and social institution are based on convention. "Slavery" is a convention, and the vast majority, if not in truth all slaves are not "natural slaves" but are slaves "by convention," that is, because men made them slaves because they needed slaves, not because they deserved it. "Natural slavery" is, for Aristotle, a real condition, but is used almost exclusively as a rhetorical justification for the unnatural, and hence unjust imposition of servitude.

Servitude is a thus a social convention; it is for all practical purposes not a function of nature, but a creation of men, founded not on justice, but on expediency. The attempts to justify it have the veneer of respectability because they appear to be founded on science, that is, observations of nature. But the justifications are really hollow if you examine them closely.

It's like what Aristotle says about marriage -- in that same section there is a line about women being subject to men etc. etc., but if you look up the quote it's from a play, Ajax . The lines are spoken by Ajax's wife, reporting on her husband's rantings after he has gone totally mad. Again, the idea of the absolute subjugation of women is revealed to be a conventional idea, not one rooted in nature, and actually sort of stupid.

Aristotle was a lot sharper than people realize, and more than willing to use our own prejudices and ill-thought ideas against us. Unfortunately far too many over the centuries have failed to see the irony of what he writes.

~ lucius septimius




The consensus of which you speak is the Hegelain "general Will" -- a murky concept that is supposed to reflect the idea of a set of general beliefs that are shared in common by all men, but is also rooted in the submission of the individual will to the whole. "Individualism" is false consciousness, since it assumes that our identity is something fixed within us, while the Hegelian views consciousness as something which can only be achieved in confrontation with and communication with the "other," that is to say, people other than ourselves. If we view the other as the whole of the human race, then we can achieve true consciousness and participation in the general will.

Sound a lot like communism or fascism? But of course it does.

Ultimately it is a way of thinking built on the totally incoherent metaphysical bullshit of Hegel which educated people want to think is profound because, twisted the right way, it can support their fantasies of power.

As a dictum of political theory, it's something akin to unified field theory. Co-inky-dink?

Oops -- there I go again.

~ lucius septimius



Averroes, in his critique of Arab poetry, writes:

"most of their [the Arabs] poems are only about overwhelming desire and yearning. That is to say, the kind they call nasib encourages depravity. Thus the young ought to avoid it and should be educated in those poems of theirs that encourage valor and generosity. Now these are the only two virtues encouraged by the Arabs in their poems, even though they speak about them not in order to encourage them but only in order to boast ...

"For the most part, however, the Greeks [unlike the Arabs] did not recite any poems other than those that either were directed toward encouraging virtue or discouraging vice or that provided something of good manners or knowledge" [Middle Commentary on Aristotle's Poetics, 2.10-11]

He later cites an example of the sort of pointless sensual excess he sees in Arab writing:

Upon my life, watchful eyes have perceived
a fire's light burning on the rise;
Blazing for two col men seeking its warmth,
Generosity and al-Muhalliq night-long at the fire;
Having sucked milk from the brreast of a single mother, they swore
by her dark nipple never to become sundered.

A poem that is supposed to be about generosity descends into a discussion of boobs. Hence, Averroes says, the moral meaning is lost in the sensual.

~ lucius septimius


Missing Links vs The Masterflaters


BORDER SONG ~ ELTON JOHN







Magical Obamanation Stalinizes Website, makes history disappear!



Beach Blanket Obama



Magical Obamanation Stalinizes Speech, makes his words disappear!





Old School Anglicans to go Catholic



Pope Babbles Green Crap, Plants Some Trees




Give us your Jihadis, Commies, Fascists, Thugs, Freaks and Banditos, & Bring To Us All Yer People Infected with AIDS,too!








AHAMAD BATEBI AKBAR!
Iranian Dissident Disappears!






Recrudescent Religion




GET DRUNK & VOTE FOR MCCAIN!



Speaking in Fluent Taqiyya, Court advisor says Turkey's ruling AKP is not seeking a Sharia state. Which leaves them free to go ahead and implement one



UK: The "Sharia Debate"
[SIGH]
There is nothing to DEBATE - this is a huge problem in the West, we let EVIL debate with us. This telegraphs a "well, maybe WE are wrong" position. If one is willing to debate something one is willing to concede that there is value in the opposition position.

THERE IS NOTHING TO DEBATE. SHARIA IS FUCKING DEATH, THERE IS NO VALUE IN IT FOR US.

YOU DO NOT DEBATE DEATH, YOU DESTROY IT BEFORE IT DESTROYS YOU.
Get it? Got it? GOOD.



US now hooked up with the Chief Dhimmi Whore of the Caliphate regarding making obeisance to Iran



SOLANA SEARCH: SPLEEN (scroll from the bottom up)



SOLANA / ALLIANCE OF CIVILIZATIONS GOOGLE SEARCH

Koom Bah Humbug, ya one world MFers.



Sarkozy the Pimp & his Two Whoremen of the Apocalypse


ROBERT FISK GIVES DHIMMI LESSONS, CALIPHELLATES FOR YOUR PLEBIAN AMERICAN EDIFICATION




Nasrallah is the "most admired" Arab leader




DANCE, DHIMMI, DANCE!

Stalin and Tsar Nicholas II neck and neck for title of "Greatest Russian"

If the criteria is based on a body count, Stalin wins...




Fun for the whole family! S & M Barbie!


EU Looks to get in on Driving Israel into the Sea, Pissed they are being left out



The Terrible Plight of
the Zimbabwean Christians

Pray for them please. Pray for all the Christians in Africa.




In the centre of one of Tripoli's squares in north Lebanon, a large statue has been erected inscribed with the word 'Allah' in Arabesque calligraphy. The statue reflects the city's reality, especially in light of the recent rise in Salafism, a radical form of Islam.



WTF is Salafism you may ask?


ISLAMIC ASSHOLE calls for full Sharia in UK in a sermon at the most popular British Mosque


Translator scandals, infiltration, and intel recruiting insanity



THE HIDDEN FACE OF POLITICAL ISLAM

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Cosmonaut Petrov and You


The Red Elvises: Cosmonaut Petrov
(hat tip DJ QBurn)


CLICK ME,
YOU PETTY BOURGEOIS PLEBE







STALIN'S APE MAN









“Well, eugenics was a very fashionable science in the 1930s and nowadays it isn’t. Post Hitler there are people who say not only that eugenics is morally wrong but also that it doesn’t work scientifically. That is bollocks. It works with horses, cows and pigs and ducks. Of course it would work with humans. It’s quite another matter to say that it would be a good thing to do. It comes down to a moral and political choice. Just as the H-bomb. As for only giving examples of bad religion, that is not what I wanted to do even if I seem to have done it. I think I could have been accused of that not so much in the book but in the television programme I did for Channel 4 called The Root of All Evil. But a television programme does not have a single author. It was a kind of ‘over my dead body’ title, for example.”

~ Richard Dawkins

CLICK ME, YOU PROLE!


This just in, BRILLIANT!

Submitted for possible inclusion in the next edition of the Unabridged Feral Dictionary...

Masterflation- the masterful conflating of things or people that have only marginal connections, for purposes of manipulation and ego gratification.

Example #1: Q-Burn likes dogs. Hitler liked dogs. Therefore, Q-Burn is a Nazi.

Example #2: Christianity believes in a Creator. Islam believes in a Creator. Some members of both religions have even conversed on the subject. Therfore: Christianity equals Islam.

Masterflation at it's finest!
~ Q-Burn

WE THE PEOPLE AKBAR!


LINK WRAY ~ RUMBLE ~ 1978









A DRUNK JOHN WAYNE on PATRIOTISM
(hat tip Pastorius)








TAKE YOUR COUNTRY BACK!

TIME IS RUNNING OUT

CLICK ME NOW!